Home
About
2024 KCP Application
Login
View Company
Back
MEETS Coalition
Org Type
For Profit
Winner or Finalist
Winner
Project
Company
Financials
Customers & Partnerships
Primary Project Category:
Secondary Project Category:
Carbon Sinks (Natural & Engineered)
Energy
Finance
Social & Cultural Pathways
Transport and Mobility
Name of Project:
Year Project Originated:
Project Summary / Description:
The project's purpose is to promote the broad scale adoption of a new transaction structure, in use in Seattle, which enables the rapid implementation of deep energy retrofits to medium and large buildings, at scale, without subsidies. Pilot projects are under development in New York, and under discussion in, Hawaii, Denver, CO, Boston MA, and Portland, OR. The structure, known as the Metered Energy Efficiency Transaction Structure (MEETS), uses market forces not subsidies, to drive deep efficiency. MEETS is modeled on the structure that has allowed renewable energy to reach scale. The project began in 2015. In the U.S., buildings use 70% of all electricity and account for 40% of all carbon emissions. At least half that energy is wasted due to inefficiencies in the ways those buildings are designed, built and operated. We can dramatically cut carbon emissions by making our buildings more comfortable and efficient. Yet, despite decades of rhetorical commitment, energy efficiency programs have failed to achieve dramatic improvements. The challenge is this: existing approaches rely on a building owner to make investments, while the energy bill savings flow to the tenants. Few owners will make investments if the financial returns flow to someone else. Tenants will not make significant investments in buildings that they don't own. In owner-occupied buildings, current owners usually limit their investments to those that will pay back during the period they plan to own the building, usually ~5 years. We created MEETS (and the MEETS Coalition) to address these structural barriers to deep energy efficiency, which have prevented wide adoption.
Country or Countries of Operation:
United States
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Andorra
Angola
Anguilla
Antigua & Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
British Virgin Islands
Brunei
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Cape Verde
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Colombia
Comoros
Congo
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Cote D Ivoire
Croatia
Cruise Ship
Cuba
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Democratic Republic of Congo
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands
Faroe Islands
Fiji
Finland
France
French Polynesia
French West Indies
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Grenada
Guam
Guatemala
Guernsey
Guinea
Guinea Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Ireland
Isle of Man
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jersey
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kuwait
Kyrgyz Republic
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macau
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mexico
Micronesia
Moldova
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Montserrat
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands
Netherlands Antilles
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
North Korea
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestine
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Reunion
Romania
Russia
Rwanda
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principe
Satellite
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
South Korea
South Sudan
Spain
Sri Lanka
St Kitts; Nevis
St Vincent
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
Timor L'Este
Togo
Tonga
Trinidad & Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Venezuela
Vietnam
Virgin Islands (US)
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Regions of Operations:
Southeast Asia
South Asia
East Asia
Central Asia
Middle East
North America
South America
Eastern Europe
Western Europe
East Africa
North Africa
Southern Africa
Central Africa
Oceania
Caribbean
Other Countries
How Project Affects Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions:
The MEETS Coalition engages with policy makers, utilities, building owners and financiers to scale deep energy retrofits and electrification of buildings. The MEETS transaction structure is designed to address the longstanding barriers for each of these stakeholders, allowing all parties to work collaboratively, while addressing their own self-interest.Energy efficiency reduces the need to consume fossil fuels. MEETS not only enables deep energy efficiency in buildings, but it enables the long-term cashflows needed to electrify buildings, removing the fossil fuel dependent systems from the structures. This has profound implications for the climate.As stated earlier, In the U.S., buildings use 70 percent of all electricity and account for 40 percent of all carbon emissions. At least half that energy is wasted due to inefficiencies in the ways those buildings are designed, built and operated.We are committed to tracking and reporting the net greenhouse gas emissions reduction associated with MEETS as a Key Performance Indicator (KPI). The fact that MEETS is all about metered savings, makes tracking much more accurate than many other approaches, leading to clear and measurable results. For instance, the Bullitt Center, the site of the first MEETS project, began tracking its metered energy efficiency in 2013. Through the end of 2019, the building had saved 4,255,889 kWhs (4,256 megawatt hours) of electricity, for a total carbon reduction of 2,128 tons (1100 lbs/MWH in Washington State). We expect carbon savings of approximately 325 tons per year. Over the expected 100-year useful life of this buildings, that would mean a total carbon savings of 32,500 tonnes. That is just one building.Seattle City Light has requested 30 additional buildings. As those buildings are retrofitted, similar or greater per buildings savings will be achieved (depending on the size of the building, its useful life, and the depth of the retrofit). That 30-building pilot program will likely result in approximately a million tonnes of CO2 reduction (32,500 tonnes X 30 buildings.) This is a very conservative estimate. The Bullitt Center is 50,000 square feet. Several buildings under consideration in the Seattle MEETS rollout are over 10 times that size. That is just one pilot in one modest-sized city. Of course, the point of this effort is to demonstrate the effectiveness of MEETS, enabling mass adoption in Seattle and elsewhere. That will allow the carbon savings to grow exponentially. We are currently working with NYSERDA (The New York State Energy Research & Development Authority) and the utility National Grid on a pilot for the State of NY. The NY analysis shows that a 15-building pilot would result in 194 thousand tonnes of CO2 reduction over 20 years, or approximately 13,000 tonnes per building over 20 years.To extrapolate to a national market, rather than attempt to count buildings, we chose to use the lens of invested capital. (Our citations are in the attached spreadsheet.) According to McKinsey, there is $580B worth of cost-effective efficiency available in the U.S. Using the capital required for the NY pilot and assuming MEETS can capture 5% of the available market (using national carbon numbers) we calculate that MEETS could reduce annual CO2 emissions in the U.S. by ~20 million tons/year, when fully implemented.This would simply require utilities to agree to acquire efficiency using MEETS. Private sector capital would pay for the improvements and earn a rate of return of approximately 10%. Energy use in thousands of buildings would be reduced by 30-50%. In many, natural gas infrastructure could be eliminated.
Impact on Underrepresented Groups:
As Executive Director of the MEETS Coalition, Rob helped draft the regulatory language enabling the rollout of MEETS in Seattle. The enabling legislation directs the utility to rank projects (in part) based on workforce development goals. They are defined as: 1. Commitment to report on workforce development efforts: 1. Workers receiving prevailing wage 2. Workers receiving bona fide benefits 3. Apprenticeship utilization percentage 4. Priority Hire utilization 5. Utilization of women and people of color 6. Women and minority business enterprise utilization 7. Women and people of color from pre-apprentice programs 2. Description of strategy to achieve Priority Hire workforce goals. In our view, it is important that the benefits of MEETS not simply be aspirational, but a fundamental part of the market MEETS enables. Deep energy retrofits (unlike cream-skimming ) require skilled labor.
Sub-Categories:
Renewables
Nature-based
Agriculture
Methane
Plastics
Built Environment
Energy Efficiency
Restoration
Biodiversity
Energy storage
Rural
Urban
Circular Economy
Oceans
Forests
Waste
Carbon Removal
Electric Transportation
Cooling Solutions
Technology
Advocacy
Biomass
Conservation
Clean Cooking
Environmental justice
Research or Economic Modeling
Measurement, Reporting & Validation
Communications
Mission Statement:
To promote the broad scale adoption of a new transaction structure, in use in Seattle, which enables the rapid implementation of deep energy retrofits to medium and large buildings, at scale, without subsidies.
Link: LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/company/meets-accelerator-coalition
Greatest Current Funding Need:
Sources of Past Funding:
Individual donations
Foundation grants
Corporate contributions
Government grants
Membership fees
Events and fundraisers
Earned income
Corporate partnerships
Bequests and planned giving
In-kind donations
Impact investing
Crowdfunding
Endowments
Bootstrapped
Equity
Debt
Carbon offsets or credits
Other